# Sometimes the sun don't shine--

These are wishes in the form of hope, tailgating the last of the sunshine rays: Happiness&Success // Have you ever felt like the sun was a lie?
-------------
Generically the same... like everyone else, uniquely my own. I am content with most, happy with few, and ecstatic about love&food.

In respectful response to a poem tilted, “r.i.d  (via vvrists)

• … Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.

tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

(Source: nimstrz)

• `Via | Tabooz`
• # ”Imagine all the food you have eaten in your life and consider that you are simply some of that food, rearranged.

Max Tegmark - read more about his intriguing musings on Integrated Information Theory (IIT) here (paper) and here (article, elaborating on his books core ideas).

IIT contains many echoes of cybernetics and panpsychism, but Tegmark’s angle on it as a physicist is especially interesting.

(via wetwareontologies)

• "Badass Versions of Beloved Characters"

by Sylvain Sarrailh: http://tohad.deviantart.com/

• So basically muggle sugar quills??

oh my god youre right

• people 🙌

• I’m having a conversation with one of my friends and I ask him, “What defines you?” and he responded with, “Nothing. A definition excludes the possibility for change.”

This is one of the best responses I’ve ever received to any of my questions.

• what a time to be alive

(Source: lolgifs.net)

• # ”There are always two deaths, the real one and the one people know about.

Jean Rhys, Wide Sargasso Sea (via larmoyante)